Or, "Hey, you guys look tasty!"
IMO it would be nice to have some parity when meeting someone else.
Or, "Hey, you guys look tasty!"
IMO it would be nice to have some parity when meeting someone else.
Where would be the fun it that?
Being the ones to conquer them? :devil:
Better than being conquered by someone else.
Heck yeah! I saw Battle Los Angeles!
They will have the same computer interfaces as well.
Windows 8 should be able to hook up just fine to bring down their battleship shields!
Without a BSOD even!![]()
Restating the Fermi Paradox:
If intelligent life exists elsewhere in the galaxy, where is it?
They always do - which kind of proves the superiority of the Windows PC platform over Apple when you think about it.
They are stealing our water!
Just remember that you posted this when the apple users show up on your doorstep carrying tar and feathers...![]()
Or we discover a planet that humans could live on immediately, but there is an intelligent species that is about the Stone Age level, with a very low population per square mile? Leave the planet alone or do we take it over?
Or think about an intelligent pure carnivore, like Niven's Kzinti or the Aslan, how large a population would you get on a planet like Earth? Perhaps somewhere between 10 million and a 100 million? How high an industrial level could that size of population achieve? Could they even achieve a single planetary government?
Or we discover a planet that humans could live on immediately, but there is an intelligent species that is about the Stone Age level, with a very low population per square mile? Leave the planet alone or do we take it over?
Why so few and why so limited in their capabilities to advance towards complex societies? Just because they are carnivores? You're assuming their evolutionary adaptation is on our world, not theirs. All things being equal the evolution of the world they developed from could support any number of carnivore apex predators depending on a lot of factors, not merely on the fact that they eat meat. They don't have to hunt to live - they can develop agrarian societies and herd prey items as we do, and sustain larger populations thereby. This would allow for all the same benefits omnivores gain in animal domestication.
This seems to have wander a bit from the original question. I posed the question of Fermi's Paradox more as a challenge to the assumption that a potentially Earth-like planet would necessary develop the way that the Earth has.
That (an old favorite, thanks) and "...cause there's bugger all down here on Earth."
Which is from Monty Python's "The Meaning of Life" movie, The Galaxy Song of course. Clip below in case you've not seen it (not strictly safe for work):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buqtdpuZxvk&feature=plcp
...Or we discover a planet that humans could live on immediately, but there is an intelligent species that is about the Stone Age level, with a very low population per square mile? Leave the planet alone or do we take it over?