• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Standard Sized Staterooms

I admit it, I am cheating by using Davo's Sci-Fi Construction set to put these in and the walls only come in one color.
In all fairness I am using these for size and as general guidelines while I learn how to texture in Hex. (I almost have the construction part down. I only occasionally get unintended results now.
) Then I have to figure out how to rig them in Poser. (One step at a time.) Once I have that down I should be able to crank out starship deckplans rather quickly in 3D. But if the figures don't fit down the hallway or they can't move around their assigned room, then there is no real point in going that far with these.


The other thing is it helps to visualize what a stateroom looks like for my campaign's players. I should have their new ship done, in 3D just before they actually get it. This way their characters, which are also set up in 3D, can be shown in the ship, and they will know things like there is no real way to provide support fire down a 1.5m corridor, while someone is advancing. I still don't see how an Ursa or a Virushi could be part of a crew. They simply don't fit. Aslan and Sydites fit but would tend to be uncomfortable.

And bunk beds? Everytime I have ever played or refereed a Traveller campaign someone always suggests that the rules say we can double bunk, and free up some staterooms for making money.

On the other hand Low berths don't belong in staterooms. They generally have their own places.
 
Originally posted by BetterThanLife:
As far as sizes of Cruise ship cabins, wouldn't that depend on what class you were traveling?
Well, my own cruising experiences were marked by long oars, a shackle on my ankle, and a big guy beating a drum, so my frame of reference is perhaps a little off... ;)

Cruise ship cabins do vary in size, of course, as do the passage fees, so in both cases they aren't a strict analog with Imperial merchanters. That's one reason I went the psychological route for passenger accomodations - and of course the crew gets something comparable if any captain actually wants to be able to hire and keep anyone worth a damn.
Originally posted by BetterThanLife:
Remember that a ticket for one jump costs more than a Admiral with 30+ years service gets in retirement pay for a year!
Yeah, but she's a noble and probably a TAS member, so she's connected, she'll get hooked up... ;)
 
Originally posted by Black Globe Generator:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by BetterThanLife:
As far as sizes of Cruise ship cabins, wouldn't that depend on what class you were traveling?
Well, my own cruising experiences were marked by long oars, a shackle on my ankle, and a big guy beating a drum, so my frame of reference is perhaps a little off... ;)

Cruise ship cabins do vary in size, of course, as do the passage fees, so in both cases they aren't a strict analog with Imperial merchanters. That's one reason I went the psychological route for passenger accomodations - and of course the crew gets something comparable if any captain actually wants to be able to hire and keep anyone worth a damn.
Originally posted by BetterThanLife:
Remember that a ticket for one jump costs more than a Admiral with 30+ years service gets in retirement pay for a year!
Yeah, but she's a noble and probably a TAS member, so she's connected, she'll get hooked up... ;)
</font>[/QUOTE]Possibly and possibly, however If a retired Admiral can't afford, on their retirement pay, to take a round trip to someplace interesting then the type of passengers you are likely to get tend toward either business travellers and the very rich. So you should forget about steerage class, well except for the low berths, and remember that anyone that is buying a passage is used to the finer things in life.
 
The guy in the second and third pics MUST be gay. There is one fine looking woman who, appearantly, is seductively frolicking on the upper bunk and he wants to look at some stupid pyramid on his computer screen?? And in the third pic when we see her lay upon the bunk provocatively he continues to stare at the computer screen in the same pose as before??? He must be gay. If it was me in that room I'd start to massage those pretty, little feet and see what that might lead to!

In the third pic (the overhead layout) remove the locker from the top wall. Rotate the bunks 180 degrees and make it a futon. Make the desk half the size shown and positioned next to the lower wall by the door. The doorway into the bath is repositioned to the wall just above his position. Replace the locker in the lower left corner of the room. This new arrangement might serve as a middle passage stateroom.
 
Rotate the bunks 180 and replace with a futon? I think you mean 90. It doesn't fit. If you don't rotate it you can get close but when you open it, it no longer fits. My spare bedroom is a little bigger than the 3m x 3m stateroom, though not much. I do have a futon in there. I do not have a bathroom in there. You have to be very careful as to what else goes in that room and where everything is placed if you ever want to open that futon. You can forget about putting anything else in that room is you want to be able to get in on both sides of the Futon. (You can do it if you are careful with what goes in there and you will have to rearrange the entire room to make it happen.)



Oh it is an ugly image, I will probably leave this one up no more than a week.


You could do it if you gave up about .5 meter and shared the bathroom with the next stateroom.
 
Originally posted by Blue Ghost:
This one seems smaller for some reason. Shouldn't it be "one game square" longer; i.e. another 1.5 meters?
There are generally two sizes that seem to be prevalent. One is 3m x 4.5m and the other is 3m x 3m. The first picture in this thread is 3m x 4.5m the others are 3m x 3m. I have been experimenting with both sizes. It took some doing to get the smaller one to work. The rooms are definitely smaller than they sound or look like from Deckplans.
 
For those of you that didn't like my first desk in the larger stateroom. Is this desk better?

Oh and for those that liked the first girl, she's back!



More like typical Traveller Computer Terminals?
 
try modeling these. top-down view. #4 is double-bunks with stand-up lockers. #1 to #3 are single bunks, with the locker under the bunk like in the united states navy. the staterooms are 3m x 3m, with a 1.5m x 1.5m extension holding the toilet/water/air recycling facility.

if you can, try putting a 5'6'' inch female (ordinary, in coveralls) and a 6' guy in one. I'd love to see how they fit.

http://members.aol.com/flykiller/traveller/temp/states.gif
 
My biggest complaint about your latest pic:

SHE'S FACING THE WRONG WAY!!!

I can't offer a critique of the room right now. Once again I'll be in my bunk.
 
Problem 1: those staterooms show the fresher in a subcompartment.

Problem 2: dirtsider furniture... still..

The bed(s), if you're going to to have a small room, should double as couch. Futon-esque, or RV-esque.

The fresher should have a fold-away bowl, with no standing water. The sink should likewise be a fold-away Both should be within the shower area, both for cleaning and space reasons. A 1mx1m shower stall, with a 20cm deep "trimmed" corner for equipment and roll-away door, while a touch cramped, is more than adequate. That is, after all, exactly the size of my father's shower stall. That gives about 1.25m from back to outter corner. WHen opened, the roll away leaves the space open to reduce claustraphobia.

The vanity really has no place being in the fresher. The storage should be under the bunk, or in thin but full height cabinetry. the towel rack should be just outside the shower, and be spring-loaded to HOLD the towel against the wall; better, magnetic or velcro affixer direct to the wall.

And please, could you keep the size down (in terms of pixels), not all of us have monster monitors... (I'm on a 1024x768; when a 1000 pixel wide pic loads, I can't read the messages because the scrolling side-to-side makes me nauseous.)

Oh, and the last couple pics border on risque....
 
Originally posted by flykiller:
try modeling these. top-down view. #4 is double-bunks with stand-up lockers. #1 to #3 are single bunks, with the locker under the bunk like in the united states navy. the staterooms are 3m x 3m, with a 1.5m x 1.5m extension holding the toilet/water/air recycling facility.

if you can, try putting a 5'6'' inch female (ordinary, in coveralls) and a 6' guy in one. I'd love to see how they fit.

http://members.aol.com/flykiller/traveller/temp/states.gif
I'll see if I can get to this this afternoon. No promisses though. The Walls are really not designed for short spaces. and lots of corners.
 
Originally posted by Randy Tyler:
My biggest complaint about your latest pic:

SHE'S FACING THE WRONG WAY!!!

I can't offer a critique of the room right now. Once again I'll be in my bunk.
Hey now, we have to compromise. After all Aramis is complaining about bordering on Risque. Besides I believe that if I turned her around that would violate the TOS. (If not here then where it is hosted, without putting disclaimers on it.
)
 
Originally posted by Maladominus:
The stateroom sizes look pretty standard. The breast sizes do not. In any case, very nice images. ;)
Thank you sir. Though the Blonde is pretty standard sized, the Brunette is obviously enhanced.
I actually didn't realize that when I put her in the first picture. (In the other thread.)
 
Originally posted by Aramis:
Problem 1: those staterooms show the fresher in a subcompartment.

Problem 2: dirtsider furniture... still..

The bed(s), if you're going to to have a small room, should double as couch. Futon-esque, or RV-esque.

The fresher should have a fold-away bowl, with no standing water. The sink should likewise be a fold-away Both should be within the shower area, both for cleaning and space reasons. A 1mx1m shower stall, with a 20cm deep "trimmed" corner for equipment and roll-away door, while a touch cramped, is more than adequate. That is, after all, exactly the size of my father's shower stall. That gives about 1.25m from back to outter corner. WHen opened, the roll away leaves the space open to reduce claustraphobia.

The vanity really has no place being in the fresher. The storage should be under the bunk, or in thin but full height cabinetry. the towel rack should be just outside the shower, and be spring-loaded to HOLD the towel against the wall; better, magnetic or velcro affixer direct to the wall.

And please, could you keep the size down (in terms of pixels), not all of us have monster monitors... (I'm on a 1024x768; when a 1000 pixel wide pic loads, I can't read the messages because the scrolling side-to-side makes me nauseous.)

Oh, and the last couple pics border on risque....
Your issue number 1. I thought about it not being in a seperate compartment but nobody wants to look at a toilet, no matter how clean it is. The typical person does desire some privacy in this area and since the Rooms have to be designed for double occupancy, even if they are never more than single occupancy, a partition would generally be called for. As for folding it away, fold it into what? Standard walls on a stateroom are little more than privacy partitions. I wish I could find that quote, but it is from some of the early CT stuff. Those walls are relatively easy to reconfigure, and are not load bearing, so fitting plumbing and the bowl itself in there would be a bit rough, especially with the minimal size of these walls on most deck plans. (Even high tech, unless it is fitted with a disentegrator, TL-17 or so.) Still will have certain minimum sizes for the waste pipe or hose and the size of the bowl itself. Also remember that this isn't a plumbing problem that you want a kink in the line, or one to wear due to movement on a regular basis.

Oh and I didn't place a towel, yet, for the shower. Having it hanging with a magnet, except for hanging to to dry, the only reason to hang one at all is so you can reach it when you step out of the shower or from within the shower. And if you are taking a shower then in a sudden Zero-G situation, a floating towel will be the least of your worries. Just secure the towel when you are done, I am sure High tech laundry facilities would fit in a very small space, especially when used to clean a minimal number of things at a time. So dry off and throw it in the Hamper/Washer/Dryer/Folder equivalent.

[2] Dirtsider furniture? If you have Gravity pretty much full time, what would starship furniture look like? Do you have some examples of what would not be considered dirtsider furniture in your opinion? (Preferbly in the form of Poser Freebies, though for the right look (to me) I would pay money.)

Yes I could use a futon, though it wasn't the look I was going for. With the small size of these rooms you aren't going to spend all your time in there anyway, at least I wouldn't. And folding out a futon takes up more space than these rooms really have. (See the ugly picture with two possible locations for the Futon unfolded.) While it will fit in the larger room that eliminates most of your room and the rest of your potential furniture. You could also just sit on the bed. I do have underbed storage, though only on the bottom bunk, There is a vertical locker in the room, adding a second is tougher than it looks, though I am experimenting with high horizontal lockers. Again folding things up, sure, but into what?

There are some things I could add to my inventory improve my choices for things like furniture. I do accept Daz and Content Paradise Gift certificates.


The Pics bordering on Risque? Well as long as they don't cross the border I think it is legal. (And I admit that getting close to that border without crossing it was one of the goals of the picture.) After all you sell cars, beer, computers, virtually everything, with pretty women, why not starships?

As for picture size, I render these at 1600 pixels wide. For my viewing audience, both here and on Artzone, there needs to be a compromise. If these forums were actually set up for graphics then they would allow 800x600 or 640x480 or 600x450 pics to be shown within the thread and a click would get you to the full size pic. Because of where I have to host these, since they have to be hosted off site and I only have one place to host them. I really can't go much smaller and IMHO they loose lots of detail if you cut their size. The issue is with the forum software being used at this end. Sorry it means you might have to scroll. If I had someplace else to host them, I could then post smaller pics here and include a link to the full size pic but I don't have that luxury, there are very few places that would allow me that kind of bandwidth to host that many pictures.
 
Originally posted by Andrew Boulton:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Randy Tyler:
Once again I'll be in my bunk.
I'll be in hers... </font>[/QUOTE]ROFLMAO! Hey Andrew, as I recall you are a Mod around here these days, what is the TOS concerning her turning around? (Not that I would post it, but I am curious.
)
 
These cabins look about what I would expect. As someone mentioned earlier, The colour scheme is enough to make an agoraphobic scream to get out, but obviously you're limited by the software and cinematic 'norms'. I see cabins being white or vibrant colours, lots of bright lights, mirrored walls and plasma/holographic screens. All furniture would be fold-up or pull-out, including the bunks, probably.

IMTU, the fresher is a combination shower/WC about a metre square. The pan and basin fold away, comprising a hard rim and a soft plastic bowl that can be replaced after each trip. The appliances fold up and click into place something like an inverted umbrella.

Are you sure the shower is big enough? I mean, shouldn't we see if the girl can actually take a shower in there?
 
Back
Top