• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Air/rafts again...

For people who still use "freedumb units" ... that's 62mph cruise and 74.5 mph top speed.
Which in 1977 made sense for a "flying flatbed crew cab truck" equivalent.
Yep. I'm old enough to remember the national 55mph speed limit.

(And odd/even gasoline days, too, but I digress...)
 
that's 62mph cruise and 74.5 mph top speed.
Which in 1977 made sense for a "flying flatbed crew cab truck" equivalent.

Yep. I'm old enough to remember the national 55mph speed limit.
Eh, all of the "flying trucks" I knew about in the 70s had stall speeds higher than 75mph.

Not that I don't appreciate the utility of doing 75 MPH over, well, anything, but that doesn't mean its not slow.
 
Until self-driving tech is solved.

So, TL-9 maybe. :)
Self-driving within a nice clean, safe airlane, sure. Out in the wilderness, sure - at several thousand feet. Heck, we can do that today and have been doing it for decades (autopilot, etc.). We can also do low-level terrain-following, so that's also a given.

NoE flight with safe collision avoidance, and off-road ground travel (especially without maps) those are a whole other thing and I do not think Traveller's computers are up to it at TL9. TL12 when decent robot brans become available is where I'd peg that.
 
I guess that's more appropriate, if you include electronic warfare.

I was thinking that a beam laser, also, could cut through any number of glass fibre guidance cables.
Was thinking more along the lines of electromagnetic pulse weapons -- not jamming, but damaging electronics. An analogue to Traveller's particle accelerator weapons, in a sense. But smaller
 
Back
Top