• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Anti-hijack program

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Shaman
  • Start date Start date
Originally posted by Supplement Four:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by The Shaman:
So what exactly does the anti-hijack program do?
Check out DGP's Starship Operator's Manual. There's a whole section devoted to it.

-S4
</font>[/QUOTE]Well yeah, if he's got a bazillion credits to buy one :D No, I won't sell mine for less than that, well ok, maybe 0.9 bazillion cash, small bills
file_22.gif
 
Originally posted by Supplement Four:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by The Shaman:
So what exactly does the anti-hijack program do?
Check out DGP's Starship Operator's Manual. There's a whole section devoted to it.

-S4
</font>[/QUOTE]Well yeah, if he's got a bazillion credits to buy one :D No, I won't sell mine for less than that, well ok, maybe 0.9 bazillion cash, small bills
file_22.gif
 
Originally posted by The Shaman:
Yes. That's the sort of thing I envision when I think of Anti-Hijack.
Offhand, I can think of four broad categories of things to monitor:

1. Changes in the shipboard environment -- rise in heat, loss of atmo pressure, systems being deactivated, and so on.

2. Noises -- things breaking, loud voices, code words, gunshots.

3. Movement -- the heavier and/or faster something is, the larger a potential threat it might be.

4. Computer access -- hack attempts and other attacks, unathorized attempts to operate systems, system failures.

You can go whole hog with chem sniffers and behavioral profiling and logging every little detail of personnel activity, but that might be overkill, or at least be too expensive/intrusive/unreliable.

The four I've listed ought to cover most of it...
 
Originally posted by The Shaman:
Yes. That's the sort of thing I envision when I think of Anti-Hijack.
Offhand, I can think of four broad categories of things to monitor:

1. Changes in the shipboard environment -- rise in heat, loss of atmo pressure, systems being deactivated, and so on.

2. Noises -- things breaking, loud voices, code words, gunshots.

3. Movement -- the heavier and/or faster something is, the larger a potential threat it might be.

4. Computer access -- hack attempts and other attacks, unathorized attempts to operate systems, system failures.

You can go whole hog with chem sniffers and behavioral profiling and logging every little detail of personnel activity, but that might be overkill, or at least be too expensive/intrusive/unreliable.

The four I've listed ought to cover most of it...
 
Originally posted by far-trader:
Well yeah, if he's got a bazillion credits to buy one :D No, I won't sell mine for less than that, well ok, maybe 0.9 bazillion cash, small bills
file_22.gif
But, Dan...the SOM is worth a bazillion credits. It is absolutely one of the best Traveller supplements I've ever purchased. I use it all the time, especially all the charts and tables in the back.

I'm glad I picked it up from my local game store back when it was new, but if I hadn't, I'd be happy plunking down a bazillion or two...because it's a damn good Trav supplement.
 
Originally posted by far-trader:
Well yeah, if he's got a bazillion credits to buy one :D No, I won't sell mine for less than that, well ok, maybe 0.9 bazillion cash, small bills
file_22.gif
But, Dan...the SOM is worth a bazillion credits. It is absolutely one of the best Traveller supplements I've ever purchased. I use it all the time, especially all the charts and tables in the back.

I'm glad I picked it up from my local game store back when it was new, but if I hadn't, I'd be happy plunking down a bazillion or two...because it's a damn good Trav supplement.
 
Originally posted by Supplement Four:
But, Dan...the SOM is worth a bazillion credits. It is absolutely one of the best Traveller supplements I've ever purchased. I use it all the time, especially all the charts and tables in the back.

I'm glad I picked it up from my local game store back when it was new, but if I hadn't, I'd be happy plunking down a bazillion or two...because it's a damn good Trav supplement.
No arguments from me, barring the issue with the deckplan scale
file_22.gif
I've absolutely loved it since I bought it the day it hit the shelves too :D
 
Originally posted by Supplement Four:
But, Dan...the SOM is worth a bazillion credits. It is absolutely one of the best Traveller supplements I've ever purchased. I use it all the time, especially all the charts and tables in the back.

I'm glad I picked it up from my local game store back when it was new, but if I hadn't, I'd be happy plunking down a bazillion or two...because it's a damn good Trav supplement.
No arguments from me, barring the issue with the deckplan scale
file_22.gif
I've absolutely loved it since I bought it the day it hit the shelves too :D
 
Originally posted by The Shaman:
Care to offer us a quick'n'dirty summary?
Sure.

Some of the info is scattered throughout the book, but the highlights are:

First off, you've got locks. Electronic locks. Magnetic locks. Voice readers. Fingerprint readers. Retinal scanners. Active metabolic scanners. Passive metabolic scanners. Each with their own description.

With the computer: The main computer links to the Aux. Computer links and terminal filters, and from the terminal filters right into the terminal traffic monitor. Although the local security CPU also links directly with the main computer system, bypassing the filters. A typical security computer consists of the local computer cpu, the terminal traffic monitor, the alarm panel, and the strategically placed security sensors.

Beginning at TL 13, starships begin to incorporate synaptics into their CPUs. As a result, the starship computer begins to seem more like one of the crew (HAL) than just a machine. This means, on TL 13+ vessels, crew members are voice coded and recognized by the main computer. A captain merely needs to speak, and the ship's computer will do his bidding, Star Trek style.

"Close airlock 3 and internal hatches 7 and 14, then decompress the corridor between them."

Simple as that.

Passive metabolic scanners employed on most starships do more than just spot imposters. They provide detailed information on a subject's possessions and emotional state.

"Crewman Annabell Jones just left her cabin and is headed aft toward the main entrance to the jump drive. She has her mechanical tool kit secured to her belt, a snub pistol loaded with high explosive ammunition in her right hand, and is wearing a ship's jumper. She appears to be very nervous and quite angry. Do you wish mor specific details."

I have found this to be a great way for the GM to interact with the PCs, btw.

At TL 15, high tech recognition sensors appear. The optical sensors are virtually non-detecible without a scanner to search for them and are capable of recognizing individuals simply on sight.

At lower tech levels (TL 9-11), starship crewers use personal ID chips.

Basically, on TL 13+ vessels, each crew member can be coded in the security computer and "cleared" for certain parts of the ship. Maybe only the ship's captain, exec officer, chief engineer, and engineering personel are allowed access to engineering. The doors simply won't open for anyone else--including other ship's crew--unless special clearance is obtained (either from the bridge or from the captain speaking into the mic pickups).

Anti-hijacking measures typically include warping the effects of grav plates and/or intertial compensators to disable the hijacker (if the hijacker can even get through the simple things like sealed doors/hatches/bulkheads as described above). Some ships are equipped with Traq gas that can be pumped into a ship's compartment (but the less expensive route of just decompressing the said compartment works well too). No light. No air. No temperature control. No gravity works wonders for disabling would-be hijackers.

Many times, after a hijacker is spotted, a crewmember can just adjust the atmo mixture to disable a hijacker. Very simple.

Or, a close airlock can be opened (both doors), blowing the hijacker out into space.

Since sensors are placed throughout the ship (as mentioned above), it's typically very, very easy to spot a hijacker.

Typically, on small merchant-type vessels, the ship's steward serves as security officer as well.

The "old timer" commentator in the SOM has this to say about the anti-hijack program:

"One other thing that the computer does for you is run the anti-hijack program--programs, really, since they run in concert throughout all systems. It's no fun losing your ship, even if you aren't sold into slavery.

"Crew members are all recognizable to the computer, just like you or me. The bridge door, for example, just won't open unless it detects an authorized person outside it. Even if some passenger came to the door, he couldn't get the door to open unless the computer recognizes him.

"Which isn't to say that I never allow vistors on my bridge. I won't let folks on during operations, but once we're in jump there isn't a lot for a bridge crew to do, and some passengers really enjoy taking a tour.

"If someone did gain control of my bridge, they'd have to keep some of the crew with 'em, because I use random verification sequences on all my boards. At any time, the computer might insist that the operator of the station press his palm to a sensor that reads it. If he's not authorized to run that board, the computer shuts him down right there and then.

"The sensor does good, too, because it makes sure that whoever owns the hand is still kicking. I've heard of hijackrs cutting off people's arms to trick older systems, but it wouldn't work on my setup.

"Incidentally, the computer security system works both ways. If the computer catches someone tinkering where he oughtn't, the whole crew knows it. No klaxon sounds, so the hijackers don't realize they've been detected, but the crew knows. And, I've taught 'em what to do. We've had four attempts, and never lost a ship, a passenger, or a stick of cargo. There were a few hijackers, though, who left jumpspace before the week was up."

There's more stuff about ship security spread out in the SOM, but you get the idea. There's some game rules, too, for using Antihijace Tranq Gas in a game. Rules for portals and airlocks...things like that.
 
Originally posted by The Shaman:
Care to offer us a quick'n'dirty summary?
Sure.

Some of the info is scattered throughout the book, but the highlights are:

First off, you've got locks. Electronic locks. Magnetic locks. Voice readers. Fingerprint readers. Retinal scanners. Active metabolic scanners. Passive metabolic scanners. Each with their own description.

With the computer: The main computer links to the Aux. Computer links and terminal filters, and from the terminal filters right into the terminal traffic monitor. Although the local security CPU also links directly with the main computer system, bypassing the filters. A typical security computer consists of the local computer cpu, the terminal traffic monitor, the alarm panel, and the strategically placed security sensors.

Beginning at TL 13, starships begin to incorporate synaptics into their CPUs. As a result, the starship computer begins to seem more like one of the crew (HAL) than just a machine. This means, on TL 13+ vessels, crew members are voice coded and recognized by the main computer. A captain merely needs to speak, and the ship's computer will do his bidding, Star Trek style.

"Close airlock 3 and internal hatches 7 and 14, then decompress the corridor between them."

Simple as that.

Passive metabolic scanners employed on most starships do more than just spot imposters. They provide detailed information on a subject's possessions and emotional state.

"Crewman Annabell Jones just left her cabin and is headed aft toward the main entrance to the jump drive. She has her mechanical tool kit secured to her belt, a snub pistol loaded with high explosive ammunition in her right hand, and is wearing a ship's jumper. She appears to be very nervous and quite angry. Do you wish mor specific details."

I have found this to be a great way for the GM to interact with the PCs, btw.

At TL 15, high tech recognition sensors appear. The optical sensors are virtually non-detecible without a scanner to search for them and are capable of recognizing individuals simply on sight.

At lower tech levels (TL 9-11), starship crewers use personal ID chips.

Basically, on TL 13+ vessels, each crew member can be coded in the security computer and "cleared" for certain parts of the ship. Maybe only the ship's captain, exec officer, chief engineer, and engineering personel are allowed access to engineering. The doors simply won't open for anyone else--including other ship's crew--unless special clearance is obtained (either from the bridge or from the captain speaking into the mic pickups).

Anti-hijacking measures typically include warping the effects of grav plates and/or intertial compensators to disable the hijacker (if the hijacker can even get through the simple things like sealed doors/hatches/bulkheads as described above). Some ships are equipped with Traq gas that can be pumped into a ship's compartment (but the less expensive route of just decompressing the said compartment works well too). No light. No air. No temperature control. No gravity works wonders for disabling would-be hijackers.

Many times, after a hijacker is spotted, a crewmember can just adjust the atmo mixture to disable a hijacker. Very simple.

Or, a close airlock can be opened (both doors), blowing the hijacker out into space.

Since sensors are placed throughout the ship (as mentioned above), it's typically very, very easy to spot a hijacker.

Typically, on small merchant-type vessels, the ship's steward serves as security officer as well.

The "old timer" commentator in the SOM has this to say about the anti-hijack program:

"One other thing that the computer does for you is run the anti-hijack program--programs, really, since they run in concert throughout all systems. It's no fun losing your ship, even if you aren't sold into slavery.

"Crew members are all recognizable to the computer, just like you or me. The bridge door, for example, just won't open unless it detects an authorized person outside it. Even if some passenger came to the door, he couldn't get the door to open unless the computer recognizes him.

"Which isn't to say that I never allow vistors on my bridge. I won't let folks on during operations, but once we're in jump there isn't a lot for a bridge crew to do, and some passengers really enjoy taking a tour.

"If someone did gain control of my bridge, they'd have to keep some of the crew with 'em, because I use random verification sequences on all my boards. At any time, the computer might insist that the operator of the station press his palm to a sensor that reads it. If he's not authorized to run that board, the computer shuts him down right there and then.

"The sensor does good, too, because it makes sure that whoever owns the hand is still kicking. I've heard of hijackrs cutting off people's arms to trick older systems, but it wouldn't work on my setup.

"Incidentally, the computer security system works both ways. If the computer catches someone tinkering where he oughtn't, the whole crew knows it. No klaxon sounds, so the hijackers don't realize they've been detected, but the crew knows. And, I've taught 'em what to do. We've had four attempts, and never lost a ship, a passenger, or a stick of cargo. There were a few hijackers, though, who left jumpspace before the week was up."

There's more stuff about ship security spread out in the SOM, but you get the idea. There's some game rules, too, for using Antihijace Tranq Gas in a game. Rules for portals and airlocks...things like that.
 
Originally posted by The Shaman:

Care to offer us a quick'n'dirty summary?
BTW, it seems to me there was an old JTAS, or maybe Traveller's Digest article on the antihijack program. In the dim recollections of memory, I think I've read something somewhere...

Also, check out the game booklet in Snapshot. I seem to remember some traq gas stuff and other antihijack proceedures in that one too.

-S4
 
Originally posted by The Shaman:

Care to offer us a quick'n'dirty summary?
BTW, it seems to me there was an old JTAS, or maybe Traveller's Digest article on the antihijack program. In the dim recollections of memory, I think I've read something somewhere...

Also, check out the game booklet in Snapshot. I seem to remember some traq gas stuff and other antihijack proceedures in that one too.

-S4
 
Originally posted by Supplement Four:
Beginning at TL 13, starships begin to incorporate synaptics into their CPUs. As a result, the starship computer begins to seem more like one of the crew (HAL) than just a machine.
Not the most confidence-inspiring of examples... that psychotic AI nearly murdered the entire crew compliment... this is perhaps the best argument against automating active measures and turing your home into a warbot.

Passive metabolic scanners employed on most starships do more than just spot imposters. They provide detailed information on a subject's possessions and emotional state.
Which is the sort of info that travellers in general, and PCs in particular, are always happy to have known as far and wide as possible...

"Crewman Annabell Jones just left her cabin and is headed aft toward the main entrance to the jump drive. She has her mechanical tool kit secured to her belt, a snub pistol loaded with high explosive ammunition in her right hand, and is wearing a ship's jumper. She appears to be very nervous and quite angry. Do you wish mor specific details."
"Yes, please."

"Crewman Annabell Jones entered her cabin at 0530, having spent the previous 7 hours in the cabin of, and with, Crewman Harold Carstairs. Analysis of toilet residue from his cabin indicates it has been used by three persons in the last 24 hours: Crewman Carstairs, Crewman Jones, and Chief Engineer Constance Summers. Urinalysis indicates that Crewmen Jones and Engineer Summers are both pregnant, and that Crewman Carstairs has consumed 2 litres of alcoholic beverages within the last 2 days."

"Thank you for sharing, computer."

Note that passengers and crew will be screened when boarding, and something potentially dangerous like snub HE ammo will only be kept under lock & key in the ship's locker; my security measures would notice Crewman Jones removing it from inventory... which would be sufficient to trigger an alert notification which, if ignored, would then escalate appropriately.

There's more stuff about ship security spread out in the SOM, but you get the idea.
Indeed I do... "How To Turn Your Spaceship Into a SuperMax Prison and Jeopardize Its Spaceworthiness"... what the SOM describes is not Anti-Hijack; it's a fully-integrated high-security system that is virtually guaranteed to be at best a pain in the ass to keep functioning smoothly as it constantly intrudes into routine shipboard life, and at worst an utter deathtrap should it malfunction and/or become damaged (say, for example, in combat -- an event I am led to understand is not infrequent in Traveller campaigns).

As with most things in the SOM, I regret that I'll have to take a pass...
 
Originally posted by Supplement Four:
Beginning at TL 13, starships begin to incorporate synaptics into their CPUs. As a result, the starship computer begins to seem more like one of the crew (HAL) than just a machine.
Not the most confidence-inspiring of examples... that psychotic AI nearly murdered the entire crew compliment... this is perhaps the best argument against automating active measures and turing your home into a warbot.

Passive metabolic scanners employed on most starships do more than just spot imposters. They provide detailed information on a subject's possessions and emotional state.
Which is the sort of info that travellers in general, and PCs in particular, are always happy to have known as far and wide as possible...

"Crewman Annabell Jones just left her cabin and is headed aft toward the main entrance to the jump drive. She has her mechanical tool kit secured to her belt, a snub pistol loaded with high explosive ammunition in her right hand, and is wearing a ship's jumper. She appears to be very nervous and quite angry. Do you wish mor specific details."
"Yes, please."

"Crewman Annabell Jones entered her cabin at 0530, having spent the previous 7 hours in the cabin of, and with, Crewman Harold Carstairs. Analysis of toilet residue from his cabin indicates it has been used by three persons in the last 24 hours: Crewman Carstairs, Crewman Jones, and Chief Engineer Constance Summers. Urinalysis indicates that Crewmen Jones and Engineer Summers are both pregnant, and that Crewman Carstairs has consumed 2 litres of alcoholic beverages within the last 2 days."

"Thank you for sharing, computer."

Note that passengers and crew will be screened when boarding, and something potentially dangerous like snub HE ammo will only be kept under lock & key in the ship's locker; my security measures would notice Crewman Jones removing it from inventory... which would be sufficient to trigger an alert notification which, if ignored, would then escalate appropriately.

There's more stuff about ship security spread out in the SOM, but you get the idea.
Indeed I do... "How To Turn Your Spaceship Into a SuperMax Prison and Jeopardize Its Spaceworthiness"... what the SOM describes is not Anti-Hijack; it's a fully-integrated high-security system that is virtually guaranteed to be at best a pain in the ass to keep functioning smoothly as it constantly intrudes into routine shipboard life, and at worst an utter deathtrap should it malfunction and/or become damaged (say, for example, in combat -- an event I am led to understand is not infrequent in Traveller campaigns).

As with most things in the SOM, I regret that I'll have to take a pass...
 
Originally posted by boomslang:
As with most things in the SOM, I regret that I'll have to take a pass...
Here, we'll have to disagree, Boomslang. I'll say it again. The SOM is one of the best Traveller supplements I've ever purchased.

I wish there were more like it. Many more.

-S4
 
Originally posted by boomslang:
As with most things in the SOM, I regret that I'll have to take a pass...
Here, we'll have to disagree, Boomslang. I'll say it again. The SOM is one of the best Traveller supplements I've ever purchased.

I wish there were more like it. Many more.

-S4
 
Originally posted by Supplement Four:
[A very thorough summary of the SOM on Anti-Hijack.]
Wow, thanks for that.

We've used many of those tactics (adjusting gravity and atmosphere, opening or closing hatches, et cetera) to defeat hijackers in our games, but we never tied them to the Anti-Hijack program specifically. They were controlled from the bridge and/or engineering, depending on the specifics.

Many of the sensors and monitoring protocols I could see on big TL 15 freighters and liners, but not on free traders and their ilk, which IMTU rarely are built above TL 11. I could see an enterprising crew adding some of those features, though: for example, IMTU a free trader doesn't automatically have video or holo cameras in cabins or passages or ret-scan or DNA-sensor keyed locks, but they are often added after the ship is acquired.

Very interesting stuff - thank you again for your very helpful post.
 
Originally posted by Supplement Four:
[A very thorough summary of the SOM on Anti-Hijack.]
Wow, thanks for that.

We've used many of those tactics (adjusting gravity and atmosphere, opening or closing hatches, et cetera) to defeat hijackers in our games, but we never tied them to the Anti-Hijack program specifically. They were controlled from the bridge and/or engineering, depending on the specifics.

Many of the sensors and monitoring protocols I could see on big TL 15 freighters and liners, but not on free traders and their ilk, which IMTU rarely are built above TL 11. I could see an enterprising crew adding some of those features, though: for example, IMTU a free trader doesn't automatically have video or holo cameras in cabins or passages or ret-scan or DNA-sensor keyed locks, but they are often added after the ship is acquired.

Very interesting stuff - thank you again for your very helpful post.
 
Back
Top