Paraquat Johnson wrote:
"Legolas hits the Uruk-hai twice. The second arrow brings him down, but the Uruk-hai dives forward to deliver the torch."
Mr. Johnson,
Picky, picky.
As Mr. Barclay points out, the idea that Saruman couldn't/wouldn't touch off the two petards from his comfy reading nook at Isengard is silly. Legolas, and plenty of other archers - including the old fellow atop the keep who kills the first uruk with his pitiful human bow, seem to be able to slay uruks at will. And yet, the uruk berseker shrugs off one arrow hit and is able to complete its mission after a being pronged a second time. Saruman must brew one hell of a Fourth Age combat drug!
Let's just chalk it up to poetic license.
"The RotK strategy problem I had was the Gondorians under Faramir at Osgiliath allowing the enemy boats to land, and the enemy troops to unload, before they started attacking." (snip of other oopsies)
Such are the flaws of the cinema - sigh. When was the last time you saw any examples of competent tactical, operational, or strategic thinking on any movie screen? HBO's 'Band of Brothers' is the only one that comes to my pointy head. Preminger's WW2 flick, 'In Harm's Way', could - at a stretch - be another. Can anyone think of any others?
Sadly, most movies have tactics straight out of 'Starship Troopers'. I'm sure Mr. Cruise's latest 'epic', "The Last Samurai", has plenty of battlefield groaners.
The specialized knowledge our hobbies impart to us diminish certain aspects of cinema for us. I'm sure doctors squirm during operating theater scenes, lawyers seethe during courtroom scenes, and cowboys hoot at depictions of ranch life.
And life goes on...
Sincerely,
Larsen
"Legolas hits the Uruk-hai twice. The second arrow brings him down, but the Uruk-hai dives forward to deliver the torch."
Mr. Johnson,
Picky, picky.

As Mr. Barclay points out, the idea that Saruman couldn't/wouldn't touch off the two petards from his comfy reading nook at Isengard is silly. Legolas, and plenty of other archers - including the old fellow atop the keep who kills the first uruk with his pitiful human bow, seem to be able to slay uruks at will. And yet, the uruk berseker shrugs off one arrow hit and is able to complete its mission after a being pronged a second time. Saruman must brew one hell of a Fourth Age combat drug!
Let's just chalk it up to poetic license.
"The RotK strategy problem I had was the Gondorians under Faramir at Osgiliath allowing the enemy boats to land, and the enemy troops to unload, before they started attacking." (snip of other oopsies)
Such are the flaws of the cinema - sigh. When was the last time you saw any examples of competent tactical, operational, or strategic thinking on any movie screen? HBO's 'Band of Brothers' is the only one that comes to my pointy head. Preminger's WW2 flick, 'In Harm's Way', could - at a stretch - be another. Can anyone think of any others?
Sadly, most movies have tactics straight out of 'Starship Troopers'. I'm sure Mr. Cruise's latest 'epic', "The Last Samurai", has plenty of battlefield groaners.
The specialized knowledge our hobbies impart to us diminish certain aspects of cinema for us. I'm sure doctors squirm during operating theater scenes, lawyers seethe during courtroom scenes, and cowboys hoot at depictions of ranch life.
And life goes on...
Sincerely,
Larsen