Go out at night and watch a laser display, can you see the laser beams themselves shining away from you? Yes.
Go out at night
WHERE?
Some place with atmosphere?
A reasonably "thick" (albeit standard) atmosphere?
And you want to compare that atmospheric performance to what happens in the (relative) vacuum of space?
I mean, that argument "holds water" about as well as the notion that because there is atmospheric drag on aircraft performance at low altitude there is going to be identical atmospheric drag effects at ALL altitudes (regardless) ... so craft in the vacuum of space need to emit constant thrust to achieve constant velocity because of atmospheric drag (IN SPAAAAAaaaaaaaace!).
That kind of thinking is how you wind up with
X-Wings (aerodynamic flight maneuvers) instead of
Starfuries (newtonian dynamics flight maneuvers) in the vacuum of space.
The laser-show beams are in a medium with 1.25kg/m^3 density.
The vacuum of space is a medium with a density of 6.25*10^-23kg/m^3. (sorry, that looks ugly without superscripts)
1.250kg/m3 atmospheric density =
6.25-23kg/m3 vacuum density
According to
@mike wightman ...
Um ...
I think I've found a flaw in the argument position of
@mike wightman ... and it seems to be a (checks notes) ...
more than 22 orders of magnitude difference between the density of a standard atmosphere versus the density of interplanetary vacuum.
Go out at night and watch a laser display, can you see the laser beams themselves shining away from you? Yes.
if that same laser light display was more than (checks notes again) ... 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000x ... less visible (that's a mere
10-22 reduction in reflection to your eyes), would you still be able to see it?
I'm thinking ... NO.
What do you think?
And what is the power output of a display laser vs a multigigaWatt cooling laser?
Um ... EP=0 means ... what exactly to you?
If
EP=1 means 250MW ... then it stands to reason that EP=0.1 means no more than 25MW ... and EP=0.01 means no more than 2.5MW.
Even if we take a generous approach of "EP=0.04 rounds down to EP=0 for notation purposes of gaming" ... that still puts a 10MW upper limit threshold on power production by a stealthy drift fighter type of craft.
Note that under CT Striker vehicle construction rules in book 4 on page 10 ... 1kg/liter of batteries can hold 1.25MW/sec of power at
TL=8 (and higher tech levels only increase the power density).
10MW/hours of
TL=8 batteries would thus require (10/1.25*3600)=28.8m
3/28,800kg of batteries under Striker to supply EP=0.04 for 1 hour (or EP=0.01 for 4 hours).
And what is the power output of a display laser vs a multigigaWatt cooling laser?
A multi-gigawatt laser would require EP=8+ (by definition the minimum threshold for 2GW).
Turret weapon lasers use only EP=1 (250MW) for power and thus are, by definition, not multi-gigawatt even as turret weapons for inflicting damage.
Why are you jumping to conclusions that are so obviously farcical so quickly (and so determinedly)?
I mean, it's the equivalent of trying to stuff a spinal mount into a 100 ton Type-S Scout/Courier.
Good luck with being taken seriously when you try to argue that position.