• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.

Who Plays MGT And Loves It?

Hey, all I did was predict that the naysayers would invade this thread in the second post, and oh look they did. Now all you seem interested in doing is "scoring points" instead of actually talking about MGT positively. What a surprise.

You invited it. Rather than post your own positive thoughts about Mongoose Traveller you threw down a gauntlet or trolled and were called on it. What a surprise. Still that was handled quite generously so I had no interest in jumping in and further derailing the thread. But when you then had the gall or ignorance to blame others for derailing the thread I couldn't pass up on the irony. So, you tell me who's really here to score points. (That's rhetorical btw, don't bother answering).

Really, if some would READ the posts instead of presuming they'd find most of the ones they think hate Mongoose Traveller and crap all over it, don't and aren't, and have said as much, repeatedly. But instead you drop self fulfilling prophecies and wonder now why did that happen. I wonder what lengths you'd have gone to, to insure your prediction were proven true, if nobody had taken your bait?
 
Now all you seem interested in doing is "scoring points" instead of actually talking about MGT positively.


drh,

Who starting counting posts first?

And you comments about all naysayers being "muggers" on a "soapbox" is what brought me here in the first. You laid the bait, so don't surprised at what showed up.

Either way, I notice that you failed to respond to my challenge. I'll reiterate it here for you:

I did answer your challenge. I told you where you find materials authored by me in several places on the 'net. I also told you why I, like many others, won't be opting into the Mongoose-Foreven Straightjacket model. I want write about the entire OTU and not just in the one sector and with the one system Mongoose graciously allows me.

You haven't answered my question though: Where's your work?

Let's both walk and talk. :)


Regards,
Bill
 
Last edited:
I wonder what lengths you'd have gone to, to insure your prediction were proven true, if nobody had taken your bait?

None at all. I didn't say that to "bait" anyone (I would have loved it if there was nothing but positive posts on this thread), but still the threadcrappers came. And given the toxic atmosphere here, I'm quite confident that they would have come whether I'd said it or not.
 
None at all. I didn't say that to "bait" anyone (I would have loved it if there was nothing but positive posts on this thread), but still the threadcrappers came. And given the toxic atmosphere here, I'm quite confident that they would have come whether I'd said it or not.

Actually come to think now, I don't even think you did get anyone rising to your bait to the point of threadcrapping or hating Mongoose Traveller. Did you? Maybe I missed the post where that happened? All I recall is you being called on your own threadcrapping? Totally absent any Mongoose hating. In fact it was pointed out, again, that Whipsnade likes it. But it's possible I missed the Mongoose hate and threadcrapping you're talking about when looking through the thread for "I love Mongoose because... " posts. Please direct me to them as I'm too busy to go over it all again at the moment.
 
I find it interesting that I created threads for people to discuss the different versions of Traveller they had played and don't like but this thread, the one titled "Who Plays MGT And Loves It?" is where the activity is.

Yes, very interesting.

Not very informative.

A little bit entertaining though since I'm laid up with a bad back and don't have anything better to do.
 
(I would have loved it if there was nothing but positive posts on this thread)


drh,

Then why didn't you make one?

... but still the threadcrappers came.

Threadcrappers. :(

And given the toxic atmosphere here...

Toxic atmosphere. :(

And I'm the problem?

You do you realize that I have said more positive things about MgT in this thread than you have, don't you?


Regards,
Bill

P.S. Where's your work?
 
Last edited:
I also told you why I, like many others, won't be opting into the Mongoose-Foreven Straightjacket model. I want write about the entire OTU and not just in the one sector and with the one system Mongoose graciously allows me.

Tough. That's what you have to work with here if you want to prove them wrong. I don't care about your past history on mailing lists and playtests, I want to see what you can do today as a published product.

Foreven and/or the OGL are the framework you have to work with to demonstrate that you know how to do Traveller better than Mongoose. Surely you can come up with something in that. At least, come up with something that isn't an excuse...


You haven't answered my question though: Where's your work?

I'm not the one claiming that I understand Traveller better than Mongoose, you are.
 
I find it interesting that I created threads for people to discuss the different versions of Traveller they had played and don't like but this thread, the one titled "Who Plays MGT And Loves It?" is where the activity is.

Yes, very interesting.

It is isn't it ;)

Not very informative.

A little bit entertaining though since I'm laid up with a bad back and don't have anything better to do.

So, not a total loss then. Humour is supposed to be a good cure. Hope you're feeling better soon.
 
You invited it. Rather than post your own positive thoughts about Mongoose Traveller you threw down a gauntlet or trolled and were called on it.
I also thought it was a bit, mm, can't think of the word. Inflammatory? Of course folks could have taken the high ground instead of taking the bait.
 
Tough. That's what you have to work with here if you want to prove them wrong. I don't care about your past history on mailing lists and playtests, I want to see what you can do today as a published product.


drh,

I can't get into any details, so you'll just have to wait for your answers.

I will suggest, however, that you lay in a supply of crow.

At least, come up with something that isn't an excuse...

Again, I can't talk about it.

I'm not the one claiming that I understand Traveller better than Mongoose, you are.

And the answer to that will be part of the other answers. ;)

Where's your work, by the way?


Regards,
Bill
 
Feeling a little guilty for being dragged into the siding...

...so does Want to Play MGT and Like It count? I've tried to get into a game but it never happened, or they didn't want me :( ( ;) )

There are bits I'm liking but I'm still wading in. I may even find bits I love to balance the bits I don't.

One bit I had a small problem with has been sorted in a way by the author of it (see the What are "luxuries" in the ship design? thread). Off topic here but the way the author replied to the question made up a lot for much of the negative feelings I've had for Mongoose and some of their fans the last several months after originally being interested about them doing Traveller. Mytholder is owed a good deal by the Mongoose community for his service there, even if it's just for changing my comfort level. Not that others aren't as good and don't deserve equal commendation. He's just the latest and perhaps due to circumstance the one shining at the moment. Not to discourage others from being as engaging here, it's them that convinced me to stick a toe back in the waters and actually buy the Main Book when I'd pretty much decided I wanted nothing to do with it because of a few fans and such (if you want to talk toxic posts killing sales, but not here ok).
 
Last edited:
...so does Want to Play MGT and Like It count? I've tried to get into a game but it never happened, or they didn't want me :( ( ;) )

There are bits I'm liking but I'm still wading in. I may even find bits I love to balance the bits I don't.

One bit I had a small problem with has been sorted in a way by the author of it (see the What are "luxuries" in the ship design? thread). Off topic here but the way the author replied to the question made up a lot for much of the negative feelings I've had for Mongoose and some of their fans the last several months after originally being interested about them doing Traveller. Mytholder is owed a good deal by the Mongoose community for his service there, even if it's just for changing my comfort level. Not that others aren't as good and don't deserve equal commendation. He's just the latest and perhaps due to circumstance the one shining at the moment. Not to discourage others from being as engaging here, it's them that convinced me to stick a toe back in the waters and actually buy the Main Book when I'd pretty much decided I wanted nothing to do with it because of a few fans and such (if you want to talk toxic posts killing sales, but not here ok).

I am sorry if anything I have said contributed to your reluctance to try out MgT. All I have ever really wanted is considerate behavior from others, and an end to the kind of threadcrapping that has been going on in this very thread. I do think that passing on a game just because of a few people on the Internet who you will never have to game with in real life is unfortunate, but we're all different.

Allen
 
To one and all, on one hand I'd like to apologize for my spleening earlier, low blood sugar makes me mean. On the other hand, it is what I have been thinking and been to polite to say. You really are hard put to find any thread in the MGT Forum without negative commentary, some like to call it criticism, but criticism properly done illuminates a problem and points to a solution. The solution on the MGT forum should not be to flame or toss MGT and move on to an unsupported, out of print, dead version of Traveller.

The other version have thier own usually quiet forums, if yall'd go back to your own and come up with some insightful and stimulating posts, maybe they would pick up a bit.

You don't see MGT people hoping all over the other forums with "criticism" when they have new threads, now why is that? I'm not inferring that they are a better class of people or better behaved; but I'd like to think that they just feel no need to mess with the other versions.

Publishing
I haven't really written anything recently. I did write a few articles for a local Fanzine back in the eighties, on AD&D, and mostly Villian's and Vigilantes, there used to some of my CP2020 variant ideas on the net, site is long gone and that HD failed a while back. I should've known better and backed up the articles, no excuses for that.
 
Last edited:
Can anyone remember where a forum other than this got 54 posts in just a few hours?

I'd enjoy it massively if this forum ever had an active and plump thread that wasn't mostly argumentative and wrestling with negativity.

Near about 7 hours old, 54 posts.
 
Last edited:
You really are hard put to find any thread in the MGT Forum without negative commentary, some like to call it criticism, but criticism properly done illuminates a problem and points to a solution. The solution on the MGT forum should not be to flame or toss MGT and move on to an unsupported, out of print, dead version of Traveller.
If someone makes a statement with which I disagree (strongly enough to want to respond), I tend to reply in the same thread. This is usually perfectly appropriate, but I acknowledge that this is not always the case, and for those occasions when I haven't realized that, I'm sorry.

The orginal poster made some statements that I disagree with. Quite strongly, in fact. But I've refrained from replying because it's obvious that he was asking for positive posts only.

The other version have their own usually quiet forums, if yall'd go back to your own and come up with some insightful and stimulating posts, maybe they would pick up a bit.

You don't see MGT people hoping all over the other forums with "criticism" when they have new threads, now why is that?
Maybe they don't disagree with what is being written strongly enough to respond?


Hans
 
Maybe they don't disagree with what is being written strongly enough to respond?


Hans

In my own case, it's more that I am seldom intrested enough, and when I am, it isn't to come in and threadjack, it's to post a thoughtful post. I just can't be bothered to diss another version of traveller, why in heaven's name should I? I can be intrigued by a good topic now and then. There are just so few of them.
 
I am sorry if anything I have said contributed to your reluctance to try out MgT.

To one and all, on one hand I'd like to apologize for my spleening earlier, low blood sugar makes me mean.

Now we're feeling the love :)

But seriously, Allensh, I don't think you were one, or at least never without a counterpart here (which was the most annoying, being it seemed a bit of contest at times). It was more on Mongoose's own forums and I can't really recall specific posters. It all got to be too much at a point some months back, so I left and washed my hands of any real interest in buying. It's only been months of reasonable posting here on CotI (no doubt partly you) that allowed me to continue holding out interest and finally deciding to give it a try again.

Dittoish for you ThunderChilde.

And others, to varying degrees...

...though, that said, some of what you've said in this thread reads as off base in attacking (maybe too strong a term) Bill (aka Whipsnade) when it might more rightly have been directed at the instigator (drh) who you seem to have given a free-pass to because he openly supports Mongoose Traveller (unlike Bill, who supports Mongoose Traveller, oh wait, that's not unlike is it ;) ).

I've seen the likes of that here before, and on the Mongoose Traveller boards which is a big part of what drove me from there.

Granted you have a case for some posters going over the top in attacking (again perhaps too strong a term) Mongoose Traveller here and there, but you don't need to support baiting (and that's the only way I can see it) posters here into such, nor slamming (again perhaps too strong a term) them when they answer to such in a reasonable manner as seems the case in this thread.

All I have ever really wanted is considerate behavior from others, and an end to the kind of threadcrapping that has been going on in this very thread.

And I'd like that, and the reciprocal too. Not jumping on anyone with an issue, calmy stated and thoughfully laid out, with accusations of threadcrapping. Engage, don't dismiss. And again that was more a problem on the Mogoose forums than here, but still too often here by some.


I do think that passing on a game just because of a few people on the Internet who you will never have to game with in real life is unfortunate, but we're all different.

It is. But (as I think a Mogoose Traveller fan suggested CotI old guard might do, and I think they do to a large degree, the majority by far) being welcoming and helpful gains you (not the specific, the general) more than being dismissive and hostile when someone has an issue with Mongoose Traveller.

You really are hard put to find any thread in the MGT Forum without negative commentary, some like to call it criticism, but criticism properly done illuminates a problem and points to a solution.

And much of it (in the recent debacle) WAS constructive criticism, not well answered and is some cases I suspect not even read (or granting the benefit of the doubt, comprehended) before being repeatedly slammed as Mongoose hate.

I do think it has improved some the last while, on both sides of the great divide, I can almost imagine bridges being built.

The solution on the MGT forum should not be to flame or toss MGT...

Agreed, to this point. And by all rights and means set such posters right when they do.

However...

...and move on to an unsupported, out of print, dead version of Traveller.

It's kind of hard to take this in any way but a slam. As has been noted, many of what you claim to be out of print and dead versions of Traveller are far from it. And such replies simply drip dismissiveness.

The other version have their own usually quiet forums, if yall'd go back to your own and come up with some insightful and stimulating posts, maybe they would pick up a bit.

I hadn't noticed they were particularly quiet, though they do go in spurts at times, and the board as a whole is suffering. For myself, and I suspect others, there is interest in the new kid on the block and what it has. Telling interested posters to go away does nobody any good.


You don't see MGT people hoping all over the other forums with "criticism" when they have new threads, now why is that?

Perhaps because they aren't looking for a different version so they don't have much interest there. Though there are many good bits they could be borrowing for their Mongoose Traveller game if they did. Ignoring a topic of interest because "Oh, that's in the CT forum, we're not playing that." is their loss. If they had constructive criticism to level in those areas I imagine they'd find it welcome (perhaps not by all, and not always lovingly, that's par for the course though).



I'm not inferring that they are a better class of people or better behaved; but I'd like to think that they just feel no need to mess with the other versions.

Implying? In any case, I'm glad you're not. It may be just as you think, or simply no interest. I think their input, from exposure playing Mongoose Traveller would prove invaluable and could possibly add much to the other versions. They are almost all played with house rules already anyway. Adding fresh perspectives would be good, and they might find some new (olde) twists they can use in the bargain.

Anyway, off to mess up other threads and drag them off topic if I can ;) (or maybe I'll just go kill something on the XBOX... )
 
One bit I had a small problem with has been sorted in a way by the author of it (see the What are "luxuries" in the ship design? thread).


Dan,

Thanks for the link! I hadn't realized that Mythholder had responded so quickly.

It was very interesting to read his original version of the rule and also to read that the rule's intent was exactly what we'd suspected.

For those of you who haven't read the thread, Mongoose realized that people really didn't use the Steward skill for much. It's generally more ignored than used, but you need a steward if you're going to carry high passengers. GMs have been homebrewing their way around the skill and the high pax requirement for decades now.

My players usually "outsourced" the job to a NPC or avoided carrying high pax entirely. In the thread I wrote about several of the ways I tried and failed to coax my players into using Steward. I see a lot of opportunity in the skill, MgT even includes a use for it in it's trade rules, but I could never get my players to see the possibilities I did.

In MgT, Mongoose has provided a neat "opt out" for the high pax requirement. You pony up some money, set aside some tonnage, and you can carry high pax without a steward. It's a rather neat solution.


Regards,
Bill
 
Dan,

I do read other forums, I just seldom have anything useful to add, so I don't, most of the time. When I do, it is never meant to be disruptive. I have picked up tips, ideas and memes. I generally make a point of acknowledging it too.

Whipsnade frequently rubs me the wrong way, that doesn't mean he doesn't produce pearls of wisdom from time to time. If I may be so bold as to say his biggest problem is also I think one of mine. I can't suffer unnsupportable statements to lye un challenged, call it being an inveterate devil's advocate. I think I see the same thing in Whipsnade.

S4 is of a kind, but usually worse in application. In S4's case it's the endless mantra of CT is the Holy of Holies, and we heathens all have it wrong position he usually stakes out. That and flaying Mongoose near endlessly for failing to meet his expectations. That doesn't mean he doesn't have good ideas, I just find them on the CT forum, not here.

It needs to be noted that S4 has dratically improved the tone and friendliness of his posts recently. He also posts here less often, unless he has a good point to make. I applaude him for that. Anywhere else on the boards I seldom feel anything other than appreciation for him

Flykiller put up one hell of a post two weeks or so ago with GMing tips. Fanastic read, I hope some people go look it up. It was in Lone Star, I think.

Signing off for the night.
 
Back
Top