Here is everything relevant Darrians has to say about ships:
Communication and trade between colonies can only be conducted by starships therefore the ships in this paragraph is an annoying shortening of starship
Fully agreed, and that makes believing they ignored two dozen starships hard to believe, while ignoring two dozen monitors/SDB quite easier
There is not a single mention of TL16 SDBs, battle riders or monitors.
Agreed, but neither are they specifically excluded.
Ditto
There is no reason to believe all surviving ships are the same type or class. As Whipsnade pointed out some are warships and some are civilian designs.
Those told "civilian" ships may well be just non-combat ones (be them Tenders, SDB jump frames, Oilers, or other support ships) that could be part of an SDB/monitor squadron in deep reserve, if we go along my initial thesis,..
We are discussing the OTU not MgT
Let me quote your own words
with MgT Darrians being the new primary 3I canonical source.
So, IMHO, and according your own words, if we’re talking about OUT we cannot ignore MgT…
I can because it is a peculiarity of English authors to switch between contractions once the key word has been defined in context. Starship is used often enough to infer that future uses of 'ship' are contractions of starship.
I agree, there could be a range of warship designs and classes, but the quotes make it explicit that they are all starships, as are the civilian relics.
As I said long ago in this same thread, if we go so punctilious with specific wording, we find that Imperial Depots don't support BRs or fighters, as they are referred to Navy Starships or just ships, and we know they do.
And let me point again. To refer to a BT/BR combo, don’t you believe most people will consider them a Starship squadron, no matter being technically incorrect, as they have (as a group) jump capacity?
I think something as important as a TL16 monitor, battlerider or SDB wing would have got a mention if they were still there.
Not necessarily. Neither is intra-system commerce referred at any point, and sure there was some (or much) of it...
In an AM, that were short books, many things are assumed even if not told about, and I guess the fact Darrian had some SDB fleet for system protection (its size, as a fleet or for its individual vessels may be argued) it's a logical assumption, once we agreed the Darrian
knew (not only feared, as Terrans do now IRL) they were not alone in space and other fleets could come, no matter how distant they saw the thread.
I agree, there could be a range of warship designs and classes, but the quotes make it explicit that they are all starships, as are the civilian relics.
What we know is they were mostly (except the told civilian ones) warships. If they were starships or not it’s not so clear.
You're overlooking just when Darrian decided to shut it all down; twenty years after the Maghiz. All the evacuations that could be attempted are long over. Darrian isn't going to be returning even small numbers of people back to a planet whose infrastructure can't even care for the people already on it.
Once again, it wasn't a matter of having the ships. They had enough ship to pass out somewhere around 50 of them when the decision was made to shut down regular interstellar contact. It was a matter of the effort and resources required to operate those ships. The effort made and resources expended were no longer worth the returns.
You need to look at the question from a different angle. It is a desperate time, so desperate that Darrian can no longer afford to worry about anyone not on Darrian.
I accept your numbers about 50 ships, though I don't know where you take it. Of those, about half of them where given to the colonies (3 per icolony) and mothballed, and the other half tried to keep contact for a few more years.
Even in this case, two dozens of state of the art jump-capable ships (some of them not military) were forgotten in the outer system... Sorry, I cannot swallow it.
As said, I'll rather believe they were cannibalized for useful parts (mostly computers and Power plants), or just stranded for those same useful parts to be used for other goals (as the power plant to power civilian facilities).
see my earlier posts about why an SDB/Monitor squadron could be so "forgotten" (or more probably just assumed lost in the Maghiz).
Easier in one way and implausible in several others. Remember what I told Dilbert? That you need to examine the consequences of your guesses? Making the mothballed warships riders and tenders solves one problem while creating others. The idea is to have fewer problems and not make more.
Possible, not plausible. Thanks to their Terran heritage, the Darrians would have know about spinal mounts. Whether the idea of riders/tenders is part of that heritage is another question. Did the Ziru Sirka, Terran Confederation, or Rule of Man even use such things? Riders and tenders are in HG2 but are they in the Darrians' minds? Were rider/tenders ever part of the military history which would inform their decisions? You need to look beyond the rules.
You have a strong point here. I have serious doubts about the Vilani, or even the ROM using BT/BR combos, as large BTs are out of picture before TL 12-13, due to computer size limits.
But if you carefully read my posts (since post #4, when I first presented my thesis), I mostly talk about SDB/monitors, that were perfectly possible, and now used as BRs. After all, the main difference among a BR and a Monitor is its deployment and use, not its design, and they may be used interchangeably
No it doesn't sadly. IMHO, your guesses and POV create more problems than they solve.
Wich problems, if you're kind enough to tell me?
I find it implausible that the Darrians would spend some of their limited capabilities and resources on a one trick pony like a rider/tender combination. They were operating on a very thin margin as the Maghiz shows. A ship like a rider which could only be used for one purpose would have been a great luxury. It's more plausible given the resources available to them that Darrian built multi-role vessels capable of multiple missions. There would be starships which were more warship than courier, explorer, or transport but a "pure" warship would be a very rare bird indeed.
And yet we're told they were
warships, probably "pure" ones...
And once this is stated, do you think they would spend more money in jump capable ones, that, as you say, require more resources and are mostly offensive/response teams, or on monitor/SDBs, that require less resources and are mainly defensive?
We know they knew there were threats, and to respond them they would need some armed forces (be them starships or SDB/monitor fleet).
We also know building those defenses is not quick, so, if you see a need for them, you build them before you really need them, as you will not have the needed time then.
So I guess we can assume they built them (and we know they built warships, as that's how they are referred in AM8). How many resources and if they were purely defensive or a mobile fleet is the unanswered question in AM8.