RainOfSteel
SOC-14 1K
It means, literally, standing a watch.Originally posted by Jame:
Here's a ship ops question - what exactly is watchstanding?
Each shift on a naval vessel is a "watch".
"Standing" a watch is working the shift.
It means, literally, standing a watch.Originally posted by Jame:
Here's a ship ops question - what exactly is watchstanding?
I'm very sure I never said that. What I did say was, in effect, that as I've never encountered it, I'd appreciate it if those who claimed that it ever existed would be so kind as to document it with something more than anecdotes.Originally posted by Aramis:
This whole issue, is, of course, a rehash of a discussion two years ago, the same people assert that, because they enver encountered it, it never existed.
If by standardization of rank you mean formal acknowledgement of equivalencies between different countries and different services, then you are wrong.Part of the confusion, also, is the pre1900 ranks are not the same for all services. Standardization of ranks begins with the 20th century.
No, 'Major of Marines' was the title of marine officers with the rank of major. It was the highest active rank in the British marine corps. Some line-of-battle ships had more than one company of marines aboard, and they were commanded by a major. Smaller ships had company-sized contingents (commanded by marine captains) and smaller still had platoon-sized contingents commanded by marine lieutenants.Likewise, there is a tradition from the 19th century of a :"Major of Marines". It could be used to refer to any officer commanding a marine detachment.
Not speaking from personal experience, but I would say that it depends alot on the size and function of the starship, the service and the frame of operations.Originally posted by Rossthree:
This is a question for any or all navy types
Are there areas on a navy ship that Crewmen are forbidden to enter normally (aside from safety reasons)?
I have a member of my Traveller group who insists that just being a member of the crew doesnt give you access to al parts of the ship .
I was arguing that yes it does .
I feel that resticting access is a bad idea and
it is important for future plots .
I need an informed opinion .
I'd say your player does have a valid point. My ideas would be that individuals engaged in the covert side of things tend to receive decorations and awards much more quietly so as to not attract attention (no announcement or ceremony, they just start wearing the decoration) or they may receive them but under a cover story placing them into another legitimate and more publicly known operation despite their not actually ahving been involved in it. They may also receive the awards at a later date after the risk of exposure has lessened.
I have another question I believe that the military can and does give out medals and or decorations for covert operations .
The same player insists that no the military does not as all the enemy needs to do is watch for pictures of newly decorated military or special ops types and they know who did it .
I feel this is bull but i would appreciate some informed answers or input
Officers' quarters, weapon storage and the communications room were off-limits for those who had no explicit business there.Originally posted by Rossthree:
This is a question for any or all navy types
Are there areas on a navy ship that Crewmen are forbidden to enter normally (aside from safety reasons)?
Engine rooms are off-limits to those who don't belong there as it's all too easy to create a safety hazard (or walk into one) in such spaces.Originally posted by Rossthree:
This is a question for any or all navy types
Are there areas on a navy ship that Crewmen are forbidden to enter normally (aside from safety reasons)?
I have a member of my Traveller group who insists that just being a member of the crew doesnt give you access to al parts of the ship .
I was arguing that yes it does .
I feel that resticting access is a bad idea and
it is important for future plots .
I need an informed opinion .
The military can (I believe) give out "classified" decorations. The receipient does not normally wear the ribbon/medal but it appears in the classified part of their personnel file.I have another question I believe that the military can and does give out medals and or decorations for covert operations .
The same player insists that no the military does not as all the enemy needs to do is watch for pictures of newly decorated military or special ops types and they know who did it .
I feel this is bull but i would appreciate some informed answers or input