Granted. Although personally, that's why you turn off the breakers...
Also agreed. Sticking a conductive tool into a piece of equipment switching [FONT=arial,helvetica]millions of volt-amps will cancel your life-insurance policy.[/FONT]And probably use anti-magnetic non-conductive tools as well.
If your engineer comes out after fixing high power gear and mutter's. "Gee..I coulda swore I had 10 washers instead of nine...", I wouldn't turn anything on until the tenth one is found.
this is a common misconception -crew on the space station don't typically use tethers " indoors" for the same reason Sushi doesn't - they soon entangle the user. On an EVA, of course, its a different matter, and tools are always dummy corded to the astronaut, but when inside the " fod hazard" is less a matter of hazard and more an annoyance - its been commented by astronauts its actually rather handy to keep tools at hand this way.
unlike tools used in a vacuum environment, tools inside the station ( and I imagine spacecraft) are simply standard off the shelf but high quality tools.After all, its still just an earth environment.
This wasn't speculation on my part but was informed by the expedient of simply asking an astronaut.
you probably asked the wrong one - the tools used indoors are NOT all just normal ones. Driving screws inside as all the same issues as outside except suit resistance. Almost all NASA tools are equipped with velcro, as a minimum, and small fasteners are usually worked inside capture bubbles or are on captive mountings already. NASA has repeatedly talked about this.
The NASA footage also shows only one or two items per person left adrift during any on-board work - everything else is tethered - not always to the astronaut, but always tied to something or velcroed to something.
well, I certainly stand corrected, since apparently the astronaut I talked to didn't know any better. I took his qualifications at face value and may have been mistaken by the fact he was working for NASA at the time. < shrugs> All I can say is BOY was there a really excessive amount of chopbusting over - really? tethering?? - and if its technically inaccurate, well, i can live with that.
I did my due diligence in asking qualled people in an attempt at accuracy, and all things being equal I give up defending my work at this point.
You guys win.
well, I certainly stand corrected, since apparently the astronaut I talked to didn't know any better. I took his qualifications at face value and may have been mistaken by the fact he was working for NASA at the time. < shrugs> All I can say is BOY was there a really excessive amount of chopbusting over - really? tethering?? - and if its technically inaccurate, well, i can live with that.
I did my due diligence in asking qualled people in an attempt at accuracy, and all things being equal I give up defending my work at this point.
You guys win.
Skyscape of the work in progress for the calendar submission....